New research shows how dignity is connected to health
- by admin
An international team of scientists has used data from a database to uncover how the dignity of people in the United States is connected with health.
They have found that dignity is linked to lower rates of chronic disease and better health outcomes for people living in poor, rural communities.
The findings suggest that the health system has been unable to identify a set of measurable health indicators that will drive health and social change in these communities.
They also show that dignity matters for economic empowerment and access to social justice.
The study, published online in the Journal of Human Resources, looked at health outcomes in the state of Washington in the early years of the Great Recession, the period when more than 40 percent of the state’s population experienced income loss.
Researchers looked at data from the state Department of Health and Human Services’ (DHHS) Medicaid data for 2009-2010, which provides an important window into the health and economic well-being of those in the states Medicaid program.
The researchers looked at three measures of dignity: the number of days a person was seen at a doctor, the number and quality of visits to a doctor or hospital, and the number, type, and severity of hospitalizations.
For those who lived in the rural communities that made up a significant portion of the census tracts studied, the researchers found that people who lived on average two hours farther away from their nearest doctor experienced more severe health problems.
These rural communities were characterized by a high rate of high-quality health care and high-income people who did not need a doctor.
The most vulnerable of the poor had lower rates for health outcomes.
The counties that had the highest rates of low-quality care had lower health outcomes overall.
They had higher rates of high hospitalizations, hospitalizations for chronic diseases, and high emergency department visits.
These results show that there is a relationship between the dignity people have and health outcomes and that it can be linked to better health in a number of ways.
But they also show how it is connected not only to income, but also to health outcomes that people live in rural areas face.
“It’s very clear that we need to be working on measures of health that actually get at the health-related quality of life for rural communities,” said study author Matthew H. Linder, a researcher at the University of Arizona.
“This is one of those opportunities where it’s really good to understand that these are very important relationships, and we need a lot more work.”
In order to identify the health conditions and health behaviors that people living near the edge of poverty might be suffering from, the team looked at the census tract’s population characteristics.
The team used data collected from the federal Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) to calculate health-specific health outcomes, such as the number in the ER for the most common conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, or asthma.
They looked at factors such as age, race, income, and education to find how people were experiencing these conditions.
They compared these health outcomes to health indicators from a number in-person interviews with people in these same communities.
In the census-tract sample, for example, those living on average five hours farther from their closest doctor experienced significantly more health problems than those who were more than five hours away.
The authors found that for both the poorest and the most affluent counties, the people living on the edge had significantly more chronic disease, high-cost health care, and hospitalizations compared to the more affluent residents.
The results also showed that people on the margin of poverty lived longer, had higher incomes, and had more time in hospital than those in richer, more advantaged communities.
These health-conditions and health-behavior metrics were not just limited to health, they also had a direct effect on economic outcomes.
People living in the most economically disadvantaged census tracts had lower levels of education and higher rates for chronic disease.
People who lived less than two hours from their doctor had higher mortality rates for cancer and stroke than those living more than a half-hour away.
These findings also suggest that economic inequality in the counties that make up the census is associated with higher rates in other health conditions.
These socioeconomic conditions were also linked to higher rates and costs of health care in the census census tract sample.
The more rural a county is, the higher the risk that a person living in that county would be living in an economically disadvantage census tract.
For example, in the county of Benton County, Arkansas, residents who were residents of two or more census tracts experienced more than twice the number cases of high blood pressure, and more than three times the number episodes of heart disease.
In contrast, in counties that are largely rural, the risk of these health conditions was lower and people living more within a census tract had less to worry about.
The economic factors that have been linked to these disparities are also tied to a number other health indicators.
In general, the more money a person makes in a given year, the less likely he or she is to
An international team of scientists has used data from a database to uncover how the dignity of people in the…