Why is the NHS spending so much on public health?
- by admin
A public health system in Britain is spending £1.1 billion a year on health and social care for people who need it, but this could be costing the NHS more than it is making up for by cutting the number of doctors and nurses it has.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) says the total public health budget is now £1,914 billion, up by £500 billion since the financial crisis.
That compares with £1 billion in 2009-10 and £878 billion in 2003-04.
This has led to a rise in the proportion of people who require NHS care, with more than 60% of adults in England now needing health care.
However, a government spokesperson said the government is not in the business of “predicting how much people will pay for their healthcare”.
The spokesperson added that “a single figure” is “not a good measure of how well public health services are delivering services”.
The ONS data shows that in England, the number who need hospital treatment has increased from 6.7 million in 2010-11 to 7.4 million in 2020-21, with some 4.1 million people needing hospital treatment for a variety of reasons.
It says the number needing treatment in the first year of the financial year increased by 3.1%.
There is also a jump in the number requiring care for a range of conditions, including heart disease, lung disease, and diabetes.
It’s not just hospitals, however.
The ONS also found a jump of 0.5% in the numbers needing care for chronic pain.
In total, the government spends £1 trillion a year, but it’s not spending much more on health.
It spends £500 million a year less than the OECD average on health, with just over £1 million a person.
The government says this is due to the fact that some public services have been cut and that public spending is still low relative to what the OECD expects.
The ONs figures show that in the past five years, public spending on health has increased by 0.4% on average, with the largest increases in health, social care and the NHS.
However the government says that the “cost of public health and other public services is declining as the population ages and the population of health-care workers increases”.
In an emailed statement to Newsweek, the ONS said: “We continue to be convinced that public health is a core part of our economic strategy and that a system that can deliver a level of care and access to treatment that is universal and affordable is the best way forward for the NHS.”
This is not the first time that the NHS has faced criticism for spending so little on public services.
In 2015, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) published a report called “A Better Health Service”, which said that the health service was failing to meet its targets and was “out of touch with the changing health needs of the UK”.
The report was based on a review of the health system and showed that there were serious gaps in the care available to patients and that the quality of care was not meeting the expectations of patients.
According to the report, the NHS spent more than £2.5 trillion on public spending between 2009-11 and 2020-19, with almost £2 trillion of that spent on NHS care.
In the wake of the ONR report, a Government spokesperson said:The ONT’s chief medical officer, Professor Fiona Godlee, told The Independent: “The NHS has a very good record in terms of delivering quality care and it’s been a good investment over time.”
It’s been the case for decades that there are very good NHS systems in England and there’s a very large amount of investment and resources available in terms in terms with quality, availability and the kind of care they provide.
“The ONR also found that the number and quality of specialist doctors has improved significantly in recent years.
In 2017-18, the proportion in England of people with at least a doctorate was 10.5%, up from 7.3% in 2013-14.
In 2020-1, it was 8.9%, up by 1.7 percentage points.
A public health system in Britain is spending £1.1 billion a year on health and social care for people who…